ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Preoperative Visitation Effect on Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: While transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a treatment option for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma, it is associated with physical and psychological pain, with concerns regarding its effect on quality of life (QOL). In December 2020, we introduced radiology nurse-led preoperative visits to patients undergoing TACE. This study aimed to examine QOL improvement following a preoperative visit. Patients and Methods: Among patients scheduled to undergo TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma, 48 received a preoperative visit and 22 did not (control group). We compared QOL variables between the groups using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) at hospital admission and discharge. Results: No significant between-group differences in clinical backgrounds were observed. In the control group, SF-36 scores at admission/discharge were as follows: physical function (PF), 42.87±14.46/34.71±19.70 and mental health (MH), 51.32±8.67/45.26±11.35, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the PF/MH item results were PF 40.89±14.55/31.46±19.25 and MH 51.10±9.07/44.79±12.04 for older adult patients in the control group. In the preoperative visit group, PF (admission, 42.31±14.23; discharge, 41.54±14.12; Conclusion: PF/MH items at admission and discharge were maintained or improved in the preoperative visit group, whereas those in the control group showed a significant decrease. Preoperative visits contributed to maintaining patient QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.