ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Radiotherapy Using TomoTherapy With Image-guided Radiotherapy for Postoperative Prostate Cancer Patients.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes, treatment-related toxicity, and factors affecting postoperative prostate cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and image-guided radiation therapy (IMRT-IGRT) using TomoTherapy as salvage radiotherapy (SRT). Patients and Methods: A total of 71 consecutive patients who underwent SRT after radical prostatectomy between 2011 and 2023 were included in the study. Treatment outcomes, including the progression-free rate (PFR) and overall survival, were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Associations between treatment outcomes and factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: The median follow-up time after SRT was 60 months (range=1-148 months). The 5-year and 10-year PFR were 69.05% and 54.73%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, maximum PSA >0.7 ng/ml was significantly associated with worse PFR ( Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a comparable PFR at 5-year (69.05%) and 10-year (54.73%) intervals with those of previous reports, confirming the efficacy of IMRT-IGRT as a viable option for SRT. Worse PFR was associated with factors such as mass PSA >0.7 ng/ml, providing critical insights into prognostication. SRT for prostate cancer with IMRT and IGRT using TomoTherapy showed similar treatment outcomes and low toxicity rates compared with those of previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.