Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034932›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pathology2024

Frequency of

Zahra Shahriyari, Mohammad Niakan, Zahra Soleimani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zahra ShahriyariDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad NiakanDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra SoleimaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nephrology and Urology Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Objective: Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on the genital warts of 67 women aged 20-50, who were referred to the clinics of Afshar, Namad, Mani, and Al-Mohammed in Tehran province. Viral DNA was extracted using Add prep genomic DNA extraction kit, and genotyping was studied using HPV Direct Flow CHIP Kit. Data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism software. Results: HPV was reported to be positive in all cases. The most common low-risk genotype involved was type 6, with 30 cases (44.77%), and the most common high-risk genotype involved was type 16, with 4 cases (5.97%) in the total population. Among the patients examined, there were 16 cases with multiple infections. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that low-risk genotypes may be responsible for majority of the genital warts. High-risk genotypes and simultaneous infection with several genotypes could also be common in genital wart samples. Therefore, controlling HPV infection is important, especially in patients with high-risk genotypes. HPV genotyping should be considered in diagnosis and prevention of HPV-related cancers.

Indexed as

Genital wartsGenotype distributionHuman papillomavirusMolecular hybridization

Identifiers

PMID40034932
PMCPMC11872033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.