ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Machine learning to predict dementia for American Indian and Alaska native peoples: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations of Social Engagement and Perceived Interpersonal Connectedness With Cognitive, Mental, and Physical Health in American Indian and Alaska Native Adults.Journal of aging and health · 2026Article
- AlzStack: Forecasting early-onset Alzheimer's with an explainable AI system using multiple data balancing techniques.Global epidemiology · 2026Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Using National EHR Networks for AI in Learning Health Systems.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- The incidence of dementia in populations around the globe.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026Review
- A machine learning-based predictive model for multilobar pulmonary consolidation induced by macrolide-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Dementia is an increasing concern among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities, yet machine learning models utilizing electronic health record (EHR) data have not been developed or validated for this population. This study aimed to develop a two-year dementia risk prediction model for AI/AN individuals actively using Indian Health Service (IHS) and Tribal health services. Methods: Seven years of data were obtained from the IHS National Data Warehouse and related EHR databases and divided into a five-year baseline period (FY2007-2011) and a two-year dementia prediction period (FY2012-2013). Four algorithms were assessed: logistic regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), random forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Dementia Risk Score (DRS)-based and extended models were developed for each algorithm, with performance evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Findings: The study cohort included 17,398 AI/AN adults aged ≥ 65 years who were dementia-free at baseline, of whom 59.8% were female. Over the two-year follow-up, 611 individuals (3.5%) were diagnosed with incident dementia. Extended models for logistic regression, LASSO, and XGBoost performed comparably: AUCs (95% CI) of 0.83 (0.79, 0.86), 0.83 (0.79, 0.86), and 0.82 (0.79, 0.86). These top-performing models shared 12 of the 15 highest-ranked predictors, with novel predictors including service utilization. Interpretation: Machine learning algorithms utilizing EHR data can effectively predict two-year dementia risk among AI/AN older adults. These models could aid IHS and Tribal health clinicians in identifying high-risk individuals, facilitating timely interventions and improved care coordination. Funding: NIH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.