ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
A limited sampling strategy for estimating busulfan exposure in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Model-Informed Precision Dosing: A Review of Busulfan Dosing Optimization in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Simulation-Based Evaluation of Busulfan Sampling Strategies in Adults and Adolescents Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Impact of busulfan exposure stratification on transplant outcomes and immune reconstitution in children with severe aplastic anemia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Busulfan (Bu) is the foundation of conditioning regimens for pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Evidence indicates that the efficacy and side effects of Bu are intimately tied to the area under its concentration-time curve (AUC). Given its cytotoxic nature and a small therapeutic index, coupled with marked inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability, Bu requires therapeutic drug monitoring to facilitate individualized therapy. However, research investigating the relationship between Bu exposure and clinical outcomes among the Chinese population remains scarce. This study aimed to develop a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for estimating Bu exposure in pediatric HSCT recipients using multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis to predict the AUC Methods: We enrolled 26 pediatric patients who underwent Bu-based conditioning for HSCT. Blood samples were collected at 11 time points after Bu infusion. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. MLR models were developed using 1-4 sampling points to predict the AUC Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) for AUC Conclusion: The LSS model developed in this study accurately predicts the Bu AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.