Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034799›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Artificial social intelligence in teamwork: how team traits influence human-AI dynamics in complex tasks.

Rhyse Bendell, Jessica Williams, Stephen M Fiore, Florian Jentsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rhyse BendellCognitive Sciences Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Jessica WilliamsCognitive Sciences Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Stephen M FioreCognitive Sciences Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Florian JentschTeam Performance Laboratory, Institute for Simulation and Training, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the integration of Artificial Social Intelligence (ASI) into human teams, focusing on how ASI can enhance teamwork processes in complex tasks. Teams of three participants collaborated with ASI advisors designed to exhibit Artificial Theory of Mind (AToM) while engaged in an interdependent task. A profiling model was used to categorize teams based on their taskwork and teamwork potential and study how these influenced perceptions of team processes and ASI advisors. Results indicated that teams with higher taskwork or teamwork potential had more positive perceptions of their team processes, with those high in both dimensions showing the most favorable views. However, team performance significantly mediated these perceptions, suggesting that objective outcomes strongly influence subjective impressions of teammates. Notably, perceptions of the ASI advisors were not significantly affected by team performance but were positively correlated with higher taskwork and teamwork potential. The study highlights the need for ASI systems to be adaptable and responsive to the specific traits of human teams to be perceived as effective teammates.

Indexed as

artificial social intelligencehuman-agent teamsteam cognitionteam performanceteam processtheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID40034799
PMCPMC11873349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.