ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Evaluation of Women with Peripartum or Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Their First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03037632 (Precision Medicine for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in European and African Ancestry), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Precision Medicine for Dilated Cardiomyopathy in European and African Ancestry
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Rare variant genetics have been associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) but the role of genetics remains unsettled. Objective: The study sought to compare dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) genetic risk in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of female patients with DCM or PPCM (probands), and to assess DCM-relevant rare variant prevalence in DCM/PPCM probands and population controls. Methods: Clinical and genetic data were analyzed from the DCM Precision Medicine Study. Risk of DCM or partial DCM, where pDCM was defined as left ventricular (LV) enlargement or a LV ejection fraction of <50%, was estimated in 665 FDRs from 452 female probands, all of whom had been pregnant, of which 67 had PPCM and 385 had DCM; prevalence of pathogenic, likely pathogenic or uncertain significance variants (P/LP/VUS) was estimated among probands. Results: The risk of DCM/pDCM for FDRs of PPCM probands was similar to that for FDRs of DCM probands (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.47 - 1.28). Estimated DCM prevalence among the lowest-risk FDRs of non-Hispanic EA probands with PPCM (7.0% [95% CI, 0%-14.1%] females, 9.0% [95% CI, 1.6%-16.3%] males) exceeded population estimates from a UK Biobank study (0.30% females, 0.63% males). Estimated prevalences of a P/LP/VUS among AA and EA probands with PPCM were 55.4% (95% CI, 33.1%-77.7%) and 66.0% (95% CI, 38.6%-93.3%), respectively. The estimated prevalence of P/LP variants among EA PPCM probands (26.6%; 95% CI, 12.6%-40.6%) exceeded a population estimate from a UK Biobank study (0.6%). Conclusion: The risk of DCM/pDCM among FDRs was similar regardless of whether their probands had PPCM or DCM. Also, DCM-relevant rare variant findings for females with PPCM or DCM were similar and greater than in population controls suggesting a shared genetic basis for PPCM and DCM. These findings underscore the need for genetic evaluations in all PPCM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.