ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
SBDH-Reader: an LLM-powered method for extracting social and behavioral determinants of health from clinical notes.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Social and behavioral determinants of health (SBDH) are increasingly recognized as essential for prognostication and informing targeted interventions. Clinical notes often contain details about SBDH in unstructured format. Conventional extraction methods for these data tend to be labor intensive, inaccurate, and/or unscalable. In this study, we aim to develop and validate an LLM-powered method to extract structured SBDH data from clinical notes through prompt engineering. Materials and Methods: We developed SBDH-Reader to extract six categories of granular SBDH data by prompting GPT-4o, including employment, housing, marital status, and substance use including alcohol, tobacco, and drug use. SBDH-Reader was developed using 7,225 notes from 6,382 patients in the MIMIC-III database (2001-2012) and externally validated using 971 notes from 437 patients at The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW; 2022-2023). We evaluated SBDH-Reader's performance against human-annotated ground truths based on precision, recall, F1, and confusion matrix. Results: When tested on the UTSW validation set, SBDH-Reader achieved a macro-average F1 ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 across six SBDH categories. For clinically relevant adverse attributes, F1 ranged from 0.96 (employment; housing) to 0.99 (tobacco use). When extracting any adverse attributes across all SBDH categories, SBDH-Reader achieved an F1 of 0.97, recall of 0.97, and precision of 0.98 in the independent validation set. Conclusion: A general-purpose LLM can accurately extract structured SBDH data through effective prompt engineering. The SBDH-Reader has the potential to serve as a scalable and effective method for collecting real-time, patient-level SBDH data to support clinical research and care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.