Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034756›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Exploring Microbiota-Associated Metabolites in Twins Discordant for Type 1 Diabetes.

Elizabeth R Flammer, Michael W Christopher, Esabella R Powers, Hali Broncucia, Andrea K Steck, Stephen E Gitelman, Timothy J Garrett, Heba M Ismail

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth R Flammer
Michael W Christopher
Esabella R Powers
Hali Broncucia
Andrea K Steck
Stephen E Gitelman
Timothy J Garrett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Identify microbial and microbiota-associated metabolites in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins discordant for type 1 diabetes (T1D) to gain insight into potential environmental factors that may influence T1D. Research Design and Methods: Serum samples from 39 twins discordant for T1D were analyzed using a semi-targeted metabolomics approach via liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). Statistical analyses identified significant metabolites (p < 0.1) within three groups: All twins (combined group), MZ twins, and DZ twins. Results: Thirteen metabolites were identified as significant. 3-indoxyl sulfate and 5-hydroxyindole were significantly reduced in T1D individuals across all groups. Carnitine was reduced, and threonine, muramic acid, and 2-oxobutyric acid were significantly elevated in both All and MZ groups. Allantoin was significantly reduced and 3-methylhistidine was significantly elevated in All and DZ groups. Conclusions: Metabolite dysregulation associated with gut dysbiosis was observed. However, further validation of our findings in a larger cohort is needed. Article Highlights: Why did we undertake this study? We believed this cohort of twins discordant for type 1 diabetes (T1D) would allow for control over genetic variability to examine environmental factors.What is the specific question(s) we wanted to answer? We aimed to identify differences in microbial and microbiota-associated metabolites in twins discordant for T1D to examine the effect of the gut microbiome on T1D.What did we find? Thirteen metabolites were identified as significantly different.What are the implications of our findings? Our results show the dysregulation of several microbial metabolites in twin pairs, suggesting that the gut microbiome plays a role in the pathogenesis of T1D.

Identifiers

PMID40034756
PMCPMC11875319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.