ArticleData in brief2025
Dataset for common wheat (
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preliminary Evaluation of Gemini-Surfactant-Based Formulations for Antifungal Seed Treatment in Wheat.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global warming and changing market demand reshape agricultural practices, optimising the quality and utility of crop products, particularly wheat, is becoming increasingly complex and critical. Wheat plays a central role in human and animal nutrition, with its quality influenced by multiple factors at different scales, from grain composition to end-product performance, usually evaluated through sensory evaluation. Understanding the relationship between wheat composition and technological quality is essential for improving product value in agri-food systems. This dataset represents a broad panel of wheat samples encompassing diverse genetic backgrounds grown under varying environmental conditions in France. It collects measurements of grain, flour, dough and bread characteristics, facilitating a comprehensive comparison of wheat quality at different stages of production. The dataset encompasses 35 classical technological tests, 31 detailed compositional analyses-including in-depth characterization of protein composition (glutenin and gliadin), pentosan content measurement, and fatty acid profile analysis-and 37 sensory evaluations from the French Bread baking test providing detailed assessments of flour quality and dough behavior across key bread-making stages. In addition, raw data sets from Alveograph® and Farinograph® tests are included to support the development of innovative quality assessment criteria. This dataset will be valuable not only for the crop industry in its efforts to optimize wheat quality, but also for researchers and data scientists exploring the complex relationships between composition, processing and final bread quality. The data are registered in the French Research Data Gouv public repository and also stored in the PO2 Evagrain database using the PO2/TransformON ontology. The SPO2Q web tool allows for online database consultation, with further access available through the PO2 Manager desktop application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.