ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Identifying and Validating Prognostic Hyper-Inflammatory and Hypo-Inflammatory COVID-19 Clinical Phenotypes Using Machine Learning Methods.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 exhibits complex pathophysiological manifestations, characterized by significant clinical and biological heterogeneity. Identifying phenotypes may enhance our understanding of the disease's diverse trajectories, benefiting clinical practice and trials. Methods: This study included adult patients with COVID-19 from Xinhua Hospital, affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, between December 15, 2022, and February 15, 2023. The k-prototypes clustering method was employed using 50 clinical variables to identify phenotypes. Machine learning algorithms were then applied to select key classifier variables for phenotype recognition. Results: A total of 1376 patients met the inclusion criteria. K-prototypes clustering revealed two distinct subphenotypes: Hypo-inflammatory subphenotype (824 [59.9%]) and Hyper-inflammatory subphenotype (552 [40.1%]). Patients in Hypo-inflammatory subphenotype were younger, predominantly female, with low mortality and shorter hospital stays. In contrast, Hyper-inflammatory subphenotype patients were older, predominantly male, exhibiting a hyperinflammatory state with higher mortality and rates of organ dysfunction. The AdaBoost model performed best for subphenotype prediction (Accuracy: 0.975, Precision: 0.968, Recall: 0.976, F1: 0.972, AUROC: 0.975). "CRP", "IL-2R", "D-dimer", "ST2", "BUN", "NT-proBNP", "neutrophil percentage", and "lymphocyte count" were identified as the top-ranked variables in the AdaBoost model. Conclusion: This analysis identified two phenotypes based on COVID-19 symptoms and comorbidities. These phenotypes can be accurately recognized using machine learning models, with the AdaBoost model being optimal for predicting in-hospital mortality. The variables "CRP", "IL-2R", "D-dimer", "ST2", "BUN", "NT-proBNP", "neutrophil percentage", and "lymphocyte count" play a significant role in the prediction of subphenotypes. Use the identified subphenotypes for risk stratification in clinical practice. Hyper-inflammatory subphenotypes can be closely monitored, and preventive measures such as early admission to the intensive care unit or prophylactic anticoagulation can be taken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.