ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2025
Artificial intelligence in stroke risk assessment and management via retinal imaging.
Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Predicting stroke risk using retinal imaging with artificial intelligence: a scoping review of current evidence.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Retinal image-based cardiovascular risk prediction using AI-CRS: a multi-modal deep learning framework.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence with feature fusion empowered enhanced brain stroke detection and classification for disabled persons using biomedical images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RetinalVasNet: a deep learning approach for robust retinal microvasculature detection.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal imaging, used for assessing stroke-related retinal changes, is a non-invasive and cost-effective method that can be enhanced by machine learning and deep learning algorithms, showing promise in early disease detection, severity grading, and prognostic evaluation in stroke patients. This review explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in stroke patient care, focusing on retinal imaging integration into clinical workflows. Retinal imaging has revealed several microvascular changes, including a decrease in the central retinal artery diameter and an increase in the central retinal vein diameter, both of which are associated with lacunar stroke and intracranial hemorrhage. Additionally, microvascular changes, such as arteriovenous nicking, increased vessel tortuosity, enhanced arteriolar light reflex, decreased retinal fractals, and thinning of retinal nerve fiber layer are also reported to be associated with higher stroke risk. AI models, such as Xception and EfficientNet, have demonstrated accuracy comparable to traditional stroke risk scoring systems in predicting stroke risk. For stroke diagnosis, models like Inception, ResNet, and VGG, alongside machine learning classifiers, have shown high efficacy in distinguishing stroke patients from healthy individuals using retinal imaging. Moreover, a random forest model effectively distinguished between ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke subtypes based on retinal features, showing superior predictive performance compared to traditional clinical characteristics. Additionally, a support vector machine model has achieved high classification accuracy in assessing pial collateral status. Despite this advancements, challenges such as the lack of standardized protocols for imaging modalities, hesitance in trusting AI-generated predictions, insufficient integration of retinal imaging data with electronic health records, the need for validation across diverse populations, and ethical and regulatory concerns persist. Future efforts must focus on validating AI models across diverse populations, ensuring algorithm transparency, and addressing ethical and regulatory issues to enable broader implementation. Overcoming these barriers will be essential for translating this technology into personalized stroke care and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.