Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034627›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Randomized Comparative Study Assessing the Efficacy of Intralesional Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccine and Vitamin D3 in Treating Warts.

Sushantika Sushantika, Nripendra Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sushantika SushantikaDermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Nripendra SinghCommunity Medicine, Maharaja Suhel Dev Autonomous State Medical College and Mahrishi Balark Hospitals, Bahraich, Bahraich, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWarts are benign skin growths caused by variants of human papillomavirus that infect the superficial layers of the skin and penetrate epithelial cells, causing viral multiplication. Warts can be transmitted via skin-to-skin contact and cause significant discomfort and embarrassment. There are multiple treatment options for warts, including topical therapies, cryotherapy, laser vaporization, surgical excision, and oral agents (e.g., zinc, retinoid, levamisole). In recent years, immunotherapy with various antigens has successfully treated multiple lesions by combining a targeted approach with upregulation of the host's immune system. This study explores and compares the efficacy of two immunotherapy options to treat warts: vitamin D3 and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. METHODOLOGY: A randomized prospective comparative study was conducted to determine the efficacy of intralesional vitamin D3 and MMR vaccine in patients suffering from warts. The study population was categorized into two groups. The patients were divided into two equal groups, Group A (MMR; n=90) and Group B (vitamin D3; n=90), using a computer-generated random number table after applying the allocation concealment method to segregate participants and then allocated into either group using the sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelope (SNOSE) technique. One group received intralesional vitamin D3, and the other received intralesional MMR vaccine. Researchers followed up with patients for three months after completion of their therapy to notice any relapse. The outcomes considered in our study were recovery (complete, partial, and no recovery) and side effects such as pain, burning sensation, and desquamation. The statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States).

resultsAt the end of the study, out of 150 subjects who reached the end, complete clearance was seen in 42/70 (60%) patients in Group A compared to only 26/80 (32.5%) patients showing clearance in Group B after completing six sessions of therapy in either group. Applying the chi-square test, the p-value comes to be 0.001323, so the result is significant at p<0.05. Hence, the MMR vaccine is better than an intralesional injection of vitamin D3 in treating warts.

conclusionIntralesional MMR vaccine showed a better response than injection of vitamin D3 in treating warts as an immunotherapeutic agent.

Indexed as

cutaneous wartsintralesional immunotherapymeasles mumps rubella (mmr)rctvitamin d3

Identifiers

PMID40034627
PMCPMC11874879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.