ArticleCureus2025
Differences in Quality of Life Between Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization defines health as complete physical, mental, and social well-being. Chronic diseases impact health-related quality of life (QoL). Health services for ill populations, including end-stage renal disease (ESRD), focus on QoL issues and mental health promotion. Kidney transplantation is the optimal form, but most patients require dialysis, which can be hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). It is believed that choosing the proper modality will help in improving patient's QoL and satisfaction rate. To help patients select the mode of dialysis that best meets their needs while they have ESRD, this study intends to investigate differences in QoL between dialysis modalities. METHODOLOGY: It was a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in Saudi Arabia, focusing on HD and PD patients in specific hospitals. Data was collected through a specially designed online questionnaire and analyzed with IBM SPSS 29 (IBM Corp. Released 2023. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0.2.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).
resultsOur study, including 307 dialysis patients in Saudi Arabia, revealed a male predominance (56.0%), primarily aged 45-64 years (43.0%), with 91.5% Saudi nationals. Employment varied (27.4% professionals), and most earned 10,000-20,000 SAR monthly (50.5%). Positive life changes post-dialysis were reported by 98.7%, with 94.5% not requiring post-dialysis absence from work. Incenter HD patients constitute 45.3% while PD patients constitute 54.7% of the study sample. Physical well-being showed significant differences in nausea (p=0.035). Social and emotional well-being exhibited acceptance variations (p=0.012) and coping satisfaction (p=0.014). Linear regression indicated monthly income impact on HD QoL (B=-3.706, p=0.075), while age influenced PD QoL (B=0.113, p=0.927).
conclusionOur study underscores positive life changes and minimal work absence is prevalent among dialysis patients. PD exhibits higher nausea and lower family acceptance. HD participants report greater coping satisfaction. The study reveals nuanced differences in well-being dimensions, contributing insights for tailored interventions and patient-centered care in renal replacement therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.