ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Public Knowledge and Awareness on First-Aid Management of Epistaxis in Qatif Region, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Epistaxis, or nosebleeds, is a common condition that can range from minor to severe, with the potential for life-threatening complications. In Saudi Arabia, particularly in Al-Qatif, limited research has been conducted on public knowledge and practices regarding first aid for epistaxis. Despite the condition's frequency, misconceptions and inadequate management techniques persist. This study aims to assess the awareness and attitudes of the general population in Al-Qatif towards first aid for epistaxis. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in Al-Qatif, Saudi Arabia, from November to December 2024. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to adults aged 18 and older to assess their knowledge and attitudes towards epistaxis first aid. The questionnaire covered demographics, common causes of epistaxis, and appropriate first aid measures. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests, including chi-square and binary logistic regression analyses, to identify any associations between knowledge and demographic factors. Results A total of 370 participants were surveyed. While most respondents (n=325, 87.8%) recognized the importance of first aid for epistaxis, only (n=223, 60.4%) knew that pressure should be applied to the nose to stop bleeding, and only (n=130, 35.1%) were aware of the correct location for applying pressure. The average knowledge score was 3.1 out of 6, revealing substantial gaps in public understanding. Demographic factors, such as age, gender, and education level, did not show significant associations with knowledge scores. Conclusion The study reveals that there are significant gaps in knowledge regarding epistaxis first aid in Al-Qatif. Public health initiatives focused on educating the population about proper management techniques are crucial to reducing the risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.