Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034609›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Is There a Hamstring Autograft Diameter Threshold for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Raffy Mirzayan, Richard N Chang, Kathryn E Royse, Chelsea E Reyes, Heather A Prentice, Gregory B Maletis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raffy MirzayanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-2484
Richard N ChangMedical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2877-8562
Kathryn E RoyseMedical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6828-1449
Chelsea E ReyesMedical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA.
Heather A PrenticeMedical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2200-6564
Gregory B MaletisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Baldwin Park, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1821-4990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hamstring autograft (HA) is a popular graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although multiple studies have demonstrated that increasing the graft diameter decreases the risk of failure or revision surgery, the exact minimum graft diameter remains controversial, with the unofficial standard being 8 mm. Purpose: To evaluate the risk of aseptic revision after HA-ACLR in patients aged ≤25 years, comparing graft diameters of (1) <8 versus ≥8 mm and (2) ≤8 versus >8 mm. A secondary purpose was to determine whether there was a threshold for graft diameter that best identifies patients at a higher risk of aseptic revision. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 5972 primary HA-ACLRs were identified using data from the ACLR registry of Kaiser Permanente. Propensity score-weighted Cox regression was used to evaluate revision risk for HAs with <8 versus ≥8 mm diameter and with ≤8 versus >8 mm diameter. An effect plot and receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC) analysis were also created to model the probability of revision based on the HA diameter to determine whether there was a specific diameter threshold to minimize revision risk. Results: In the propensity score-weighted Cox model, <8 mm autografts had a higher risk of aseptic revision compared with ≥8 mm autografts (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.01-1.71]; Conclusion: A 32% higher risk of revision was observed in smaller graft diameter groups (<8 or ≤8 mm) compared with larger graft sizes (≥8 or >8 mm), regardless of specific diameter cutoff. In a cohort of almost 6000 HA-ACLR, the authors were unable to determine a definitive minimum graft diameter threshold that should be used.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligamentanterior cruciate ligament reconstructiongraft diameterhamstringminimum graft diameter

Identifiers

PMID40034609
PMCPMC11872734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.