ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
TriSwinUNETR lobe segmentation model for computing DIR-free CT-ventilation.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep-learning based quantitative evaluation of postoperative atelectasis following right upper lobectomy.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of perfusion imaging with pulmonary function test data using Voronoi-based discretization.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Detection of phase-binning and interpolation artifacts in 4-dimensional computed tomography imaging using deep learning and rule-based approaches.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Functional radiotherapy avoids the delivery of high-radiation dosages to high-ventilated lung areas. Methods to determine CT-ventilation imaging (CTVI) typically rely on deformable image registration (DIR) to calculate volume changes within inhale/exhale CT image pairs. Since DIR is a non-trivial task that can bias CTVI, we hypothesize that lung volume changes needed to calculate CTVI can be computed from AI-driven lobe segmentations in inhale/exhale phases, without DIR. We utilize a novel lobe segmentation pipeline (TriSwinUNETR), and the resulting inhale/exhale lobe volumes are used to calculate CTVI. Methods: Our pipeline involves three SwinUNETR networks, each trained on 6,501 CT image pairs from the COPDGene study. An initial network provides right/left lung segmentations used to define bounding boxes for each lung. Bounding boxes are resized to focus on lung volumes and then lobes are segmented with dedicated right and left SwinUNETR networks. Fine-tuning was conducted on CTs from 11 patients treated with radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Five-fold cross-validation was then performed on 51 LUNA16 cases with manually delineated ground truth. Breathing-induced volume change was calculated for each lobe using AI-defined lobe volumes from inhale/exhale phases, without DIR. Resulting lobar CTVI values were validated with 4DCT and positron emission tomography (PET)-Galligas ventilation imaging for 19 lung cancer patients. Spatial Spearman correlation between TriSwinUNETR lobe ventilation and ground-truth PET-Galligas ventilation was calculated for each patient. Results: TriSwinUNETR achieved a state-of-the-art mean Dice score of 93.72% (RUL: 93.49%, RML: 85.78%, RLL: 95.65%, LUL: 97.12%, LLL: 96.58%), outperforming best-reported accuracy of 92.81% for the lobe segmentation task. CTVI calculations yielded a median Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.9 across 19 cases, with 13 cases exhibiting correlations of at least 0.5, indicating strong agreement with PET-Galligas ventilation. Conclusion: Our TriSwinUNETR pipeline demonstrated superior performance in the lobe segmentation task, while our segmentation-based CTVI exhibited strong agreement with PET-Galligas ventilation. Moreover, as our approach leverages deep-learning for segmentation, it provides interpretable ventilation results and facilitates quality assurance, thereby reducing reliance on DIR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.