Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034581›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2025

Desensitization to colecalciferol in 18 patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Özge Atik, Fatma Merve Tepetam, Şeyma Özden, Ali Can, Bengü Şaylan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Özge AtikUniversity of Health Sciences, Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Immunology and Allergy, İstanbul, Turkey.
Fatma Merve TepetamUniversity of Health Sciences, Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Immunology and Allergy, İstanbul, Turkey.
Şeyma ÖzdenUniversity of Health Sciences, Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Department of Immunology and Allergy, İstanbul, Turkey.
Ali CanUniversity of Health Sciences, Van Training and Research Hospital, Department of Immunology and Allergy, Van, Turkey.
Bengü ŞaylanUniversity of Health Sciences Süreyyapaşa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Chest Diseases Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to colecalciferol (vitamin D) have been rarely reported and the mechanism is unknown. As an alternative treatment was not recommended for vitamin D deficiency, a desensitization protocol with colecalciferol can be performed. We found that there is no standard desensitization protocol for vitamin D. In this study, we aimed to investigate clinical features and skin test results of patients with HSRs to the vitamin D and effectiveness of the 6-step desensitization protocol in which we applied oral drops of colecalciferol. Method: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 18 patients with a history of HSRs to oral vitamin D supplements and patients who were planned to receive oral vitamin D replacement. Before desensitization, some of the patients underwent skin tests (skin prick test and intradermal test) with colecalciferol, and the results were recorded. Skin tests were not performed in patients with a history of drug use (antihistamine, systemic steroid, omalizumab, etc.) that affected the results of skin tests. All patients were applied an one bag 6-step desensitization protocol with colecalciferol. Vitamin D3 solution was administered totally 30 drop (4000 IU)/day (1 drop:133.33 IU of 3333 IU/mL) dose of colecalciferol (Devit-3®, DEVA-Türkiye, 15 mL/50,000 IU, 1 mL = 25 drop) at 15-minutes intervals without premedication. Results: The patient group consisted of 16 female subjects (89%); the mean age was 46 ± 12 years. When the patients were evaluated in terms of the risk of hypersensitivity reactions according to their clinical history, 5 patients had a history of anaphylaxis with vitamin D preparations (colecalciferol oral drop, n = 3; colecalciferol capsule, n = 2), and 13 patients had a history of HSRs other than anaphylaxis with isolated cutaneous reactions (pruritus, flushing, urticaria and angioedema) (n = 11, colecalciferol oral drop; n = 2, colecalciferol capsule). Skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT) were performed on 9 patients. SPTs and IDTs were negative in all patients. Urticaria occur during desensitization in only one patient but vitamin D replacement was performed within the following 48-72 h after HSRs. All other patients tolerated 30 drop (4000 IU) and have continued to take same dose every day for the last 6 weeks with no adverse reactions. Conclusion: Desensitization with oral vitamin D preparations has a crucial role for patients who can not receive vitamin D supplements by other ways. Vitamin D drop forms, which are better absorbed than capsule forms which contains the lowest units per/mL without the need to dilute the preparation, not contain any additives with HSRs potential such as gelatin and peanut oil are good option. Our 6-step desensitization protocol with oral drop of colecalciferol is a reliable protocol in patients with a history of vitamin D HSRs.

Indexed as

Allergy of colecalciferolDesensitizationDrug hypersensitivityDrug reaction

Identifiers

PMID40034581
PMCPMC11873155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.