ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Machine learning-based mortality risk assessment in first-episode bipolar disorder: a transdiagnostic external validation study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing Treatment Strategies in the Bipolar Disorder Spectrum With Classical AI Approaches: Systematic Review of Performance, Bias, and Clinical Applicability.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Developing an explainable machine learning model using body composition to predict cardiovascular mortality in initial dialysis patients: a multicenter study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Bipolar Disorder: Applications of Machine Learning Models for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome Prediction.Alpha psychiatry · 2025Article
- Bipolar Disorder and Poisoning due to Medicines or Illegal Substances.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate mortality risk prediction could enhance treatment planning in bipolar disorder, where mortality rates rival those of many cancers. Such prognostic tools are lacking in psychiatry, where assessments typically emphasize immediate suicidality while neglecting long-term mortality risks, and their clinical use is debated. We evaluated the recently developed machine learning model MIRACLE-FEP, initially developed for first-episode psychosis, in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with first-episode bipolar disorder (FEBD), hypothesizing that it would provide accurate risk prediction and guide pharmacotherapy decisions. Methods: We utilized national register-based cohorts of FEBD patients from Sweden (N = 31,013, followed 2006-2021) and Finland (N = 13,956, followed 1996-2018). We assessed the MIRACLE-FEP model's performance in predicting all-cause mortality using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. Additionally, we conducted a pharmacoepidemiologic analysis to examine the relationship between predicted mortality risk and pharmacotherapy effectiveness. Findings: MIRACLE-FEP achieved an AUROC = 0.77 (95%CI = 0.73-0.80) for 2-year mortality prediction in Sweden and 0.71 (95%CI = 0.67-0.75) in Finland. For 10-year all-cause mortality prediction, the model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.71 in both cohorts. The model demonstrated relatively good calibration and indicated potential clinical utility in decision curve analysis. Among patients with predicted risk exceeding the observed two-year mortality rate in FEBD, the lowest mortality risk was observed with polytherapy regimens (compared to non-use of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers), including quetiapine and lamotrigine (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.23-0.80) or mood stabilizer polytherapy (HR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.27-0.82). Conversely, in patients with predicted risk below this threshold, complex pharmacotherapy was not associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk. Interpretation: MIRACLE-FEP offers a promising approach to predicting long-term mortality risk and could guide proactive treatment decisions, such as targeting combination pharmacotherapy, in FEBD. Funding: The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, FORTE (2021-01079).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.