Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034574›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Machine learning-based mortality risk assessment in first-episode bipolar disorder: a transdiagnostic external validation study.

Johannes Lieslehto, Jari Tiihonen, Markku Lähteenvuo, Alexander Kautzky, Aemal Akhtar, Bergný Ármannsdóttir, Stefan Leucht, Christoph U Correll, Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz, Antti Tanskanen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Johannes LieslehtoDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Jari TiihonenDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Markku LähteenvuoDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Alexander KautzkyDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aemal AkhtarDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bergný ÁrmannsdóttirDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan LeuchtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Ellenor Mittendorfer-RutzDivision of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Antti TanskanenDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Heidi TaipaleDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate mortality risk prediction could enhance treatment planning in bipolar disorder, where mortality rates rival those of many cancers. Such prognostic tools are lacking in psychiatry, where assessments typically emphasize immediate suicidality while neglecting long-term mortality risks, and their clinical use is debated. We evaluated the recently developed machine learning model MIRACLE-FEP, initially developed for first-episode psychosis, in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with first-episode bipolar disorder (FEBD), hypothesizing that it would provide accurate risk prediction and guide pharmacotherapy decisions. Methods: We utilized national register-based cohorts of FEBD patients from Sweden (N = 31,013, followed 2006-2021) and Finland (N = 13,956, followed 1996-2018). We assessed the MIRACLE-FEP model's performance in predicting all-cause mortality using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. Additionally, we conducted a pharmacoepidemiologic analysis to examine the relationship between predicted mortality risk and pharmacotherapy effectiveness. Findings: MIRACLE-FEP achieved an AUROC = 0.77 (95%CI = 0.73-0.80) for 2-year mortality prediction in Sweden and 0.71 (95%CI = 0.67-0.75) in Finland. For 10-year all-cause mortality prediction, the model demonstrated an AUROC of 0.71 in both cohorts. The model demonstrated relatively good calibration and indicated potential clinical utility in decision curve analysis. Among patients with predicted risk exceeding the observed two-year mortality rate in FEBD, the lowest mortality risk was observed with polytherapy regimens (compared to non-use of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers), including quetiapine and lamotrigine (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.23-0.80) or mood stabilizer polytherapy (HR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.27-0.82). Conversely, in patients with predicted risk below this threshold, complex pharmacotherapy was not associated with a significant reduction in mortality risk. Interpretation: MIRACLE-FEP offers a promising approach to predicting long-term mortality risk and could guide proactive treatment decisions, such as targeting combination pharmacotherapy, in FEBD. Funding: The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, FORTE (2021-01079).

Indexed as

Bipolar disorderMachine learningPharmacotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40034574
PMCPMC11874523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.