Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034571›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Severe maternal morbidity in the high income setting: a systematic review of composite definitions.

Ian Henderson, Rosie Lynch, Stephen Gerry, Jenny McLeish, Peter Watkinson, Marian Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian HendersonNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Rosie LynchNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Stephen GerryCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
Jenny McLeishNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
Peter WatkinsonCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is an important indicator for the improvement of maternity care. Measurement of SMM varies, limiting global comparisons. To promote concordance we studied how SMM has been defined in epidemiological practice. Methods: Comprehensive composite definitions of SMM in pregnancy or up to 6 weeks postnatal that captured both obstetric and non-obstetric processes in high-income settings were identified through a prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42023421377) systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar 01/01/1993-31/08/2024. Clinical concepts, diagnostic and procedural codes captured by definitions of SMM were compared and the variation between definitions was described. Findings: The initial search identified 7852 records and 40 studies were included: 28 studies that reported 32 definitions of SMM for use with administrative data, with median incidence of 11.4/1000, and 13 studies that reported 13 definitions for use with the primary medical record, with median SMM incidence of 6.7/1000. The majority of definitions included cardiac, respiratory, and renal dysfunction or failure; haemorrhagic, thrombotic or infective morbidity; and critical interventions. Up to 75% of cases of SMM under some definitions involved transfusion. The main source of variation between definitions was the selection and definition of common obstetric diagnoses. Variation in the sources of additional routine data required to construct a definition also limited comparability. Interpretation: Despite common approaches to defining SMM, there are opportunities to improve comparability. No two definitions for use with administrative data in different settings involved a similar incidence and set of components and involved a similar distribution of components among cases. Harmonization of the purpose, constituent codes, and sources of data would facilitate comparisons between maternity systems. Funding: This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [MR/X006115/1] as well as the National Institute for Health Research [NIHR204430].

Indexed as

Maternal healthMorbidityOutcome definitionPregnancyPregnancy complicationsSevere maternal morbidity

Identifiers

PMID40034571
PMCPMC11874727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.