Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034567›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Measuring the WHO Global Breast Cancer Initiative Pillars' key performance indicators in Sub-Saharan Africa: experience in the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes hospital-based cohort study.

Pauline Boucheron, Annelle Zietsman, Angelica Anele, Awa U Offiah, Moses Galukande, Groesbeck Parham, Leeya Pinder, Tingting Mo, Milena Foerster, Joachim Schüz and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Pauline BoucheronInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France.
Annelle ZietsmanAB May Cancer Centre, Windhoek Central Hospital, Windhoek, Namibia.
Angelica AneleFederal Medical Centre, Owerri, Nigeria.
Awa U OffiahAbia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Nigeria.
Moses GalukandeCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Groesbeck ParhamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Leeya PinderUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tingting MoInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France.
Milena FoersterInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France.
Joachim SchüzInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France.
Benjamin O AndersonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mary NyangasiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Isabel Dos-Santos-SilvaDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), London, United Kingdom.
Valerie McCormackInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, Lyon, France.

Funding

African Breast Cancer - Disparities in Outcomes - Plus (ABC-DO Plus): Ghana mentoring supplementR01CA244559 · NCI · INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RES ON CANCER · PI DOS SANTOS SILVA, ISABEL, MCCORMACK, VALERIE · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244559World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization Global Breast Cancer Initiative aims to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality through three pillars, whose key performance indicators (KPIs) and benchmarks are: (KPI-1) ≥60% BC diagnosed at early stage (I/II), (KPI-2) all suspected BC diagnosed ≤60 days from health system presentation, and (KPI-3) ≥80% of BC patients completing recommended treatment. We aimed to inform measurement of these KPIs in the context of a multi-country hospital-based study. Methods: We included all women who participated to the African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes (ABC-DO) prospective cohort study (excluding South Africa), recruited between 2014 and 2017, across five population-race groups spanning low to high survival: Nigeria, Uganda, Zambia, Namibian black and Namibian non-black women. Follow-up was up to five years post-diagnosis. For each KPI, we reported challenges, assumptions and consistencies in measuring them; completeness and group-level estimations of each KPI were assessed using descriptive analyses. To evaluate their discriminatory ability, we assessed group-level correlations between KPI estimates and five-year net survival. Findings: KPI-1 was extracted from study or medical records for 1389/1473 (94%). KPI-2 relied upon the woman's recall of her date of first contact with the healthcare system and a pathology date, both of which were available for 1222/1473 (83%) but inconsistent for 114/1222 (9.3%). KPI-3, estimated using dates of receipt of multiple therapies from medical records and patient interviews over 12 months, was estimated for 1129/1188 (95%), but uncertain in 113/1129 (10%). For each population group, KPIs achievements were similar for KPI-1 and KPI-2, at 22-49%, and lowest for KPI-3 (<30%). Highest KPIs values were observed in Namibian non-black women who had the highest survival. Interpretation: Data collection systems specifically set up for prospective hospital-based studies can be used to collect the necessary data to measure these three GBCI KPIs. Funding: National Cancer Institute (United States).

Indexed as

Breast cancerGlobal Breast Cancer InitiativeKey performance indicatorsSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40034567
PMCPMC11872636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.