ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Foot sole two-point discrimination is not associated with dynamic standing balance in healthy adults.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Letrozole Administration on Reproductive Performance and Plasma Metabolites of Ewes During Estrus Synchronization Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To evaluate the association between foot sole two-point discrimination and dynamic standing balance. [Participants and Methods] This cross-sectional, observational study included 50 healthy adults. Participants were made to stand on a firm or foam surface with eyes open or closed, and the center of pressure length was measured for static standing balance and limits of stability for dynamic standing balance. Two-point discrimination and muscle strength were assessed using the two-point discrimination test and toe grip strength, respectively. We then analyzed the association with sensory-motor assessment and standing balance. [Results] Significant differences were observed for almost all factors between static and dynamic standing balance. Two-point discrimination was associated with static standing balance, and muscle strength was associated with dynamic standing balance on a firm floor. There was no significant association between two-point discrimination and dynamic standing balance. [Conclusion] These results indicate that foot sole two-point discrimination is not directly associated with dynamic standing balance in healthy adults. Therefore, postural stability must be evaluated considering the specific floor surfaces and sensory conditions in clinical situations, and assessment of dynamic standing balance based only on two-point discrimination should be avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.