ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2025
Early rehabilitation with lumbar-type hybrid assistive limb for acute stroke patients: a pilot study and clinical review.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction Models for Gait Independence in Patients with Post-Stroke Hemiplegia in a Convalescent Rehabilitation Ward: Comparison of Predictive Performance Between Different Trunk Function Assessments.Japanese journal of comprehensive rehabilitation science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] To examine the impacts of using lumbar-type hybrid assistive limbs during the acute stage of stroke, specifically on motor function involving the trunk and activities of daily living, as compared to conventional physical therapy. [Participants and Methods] This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to either the hybrid assistive limb or conventional physical therapy groups and underwent early rehabilitation with and without hybrid assistive limb training for ten 40-minute sessions over 10 days. Motor functions, including trunk function and activities of daily living, were evaluated before and immediately after the rehabilitation. [Results] Fifteen patients (median age, 67 years; hybrid assistive limb, n=7; conventional physical therapy, n=8) completed the study. No adverse events were observed. After training, both groups exhibited significant improvements on Berg Balance Scale, Functional Independence Measure-total, Functional Independence Measure-motor, and Stroke Impairment Assessment Set-motor scores. The conventional physical therapy group further exhibited significant enhancement in the Functional Independence Measure-cognitive and Functional Ambulation Category. The degree of improvement on the Berg Balance Scale was significantly larger in the hybrid assistive limb group than in the conventional physical therapy group. [Conclusion] Early rehabilitation using lumbar-type hybrid assistive limbs can improve trunk function in the early stages of stroke more than conventional physical therapy and may enhance walking ability and activities of daily living.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.