Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034491›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Factors influencing the adoption of innovation in spine surgery: An international survey of AO spine network.

Arun Kumar Viswanadha, Luca Ambrosio, Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen, Zorica Buser, Hans Joerg Meisel, Nancy Santesso, Jason P Y Cheung, Yabin Wu, Hai V Le, Gianluca Vadalà and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Arun Kumar ViswanadhaReva Spine Centre, Visakhapatnam, India.
Luca AmbrosioOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Pieter-Paul A VergroesenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Noordwest Hospitals, Alkmaar, the Netherlands.
Zorica BuserGerling Institute, New York City, NY, USA.
Hans Joerg MeiselDepartment of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Germany.
Nancy SantessoDepartment of Health Research Methods Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jason P Y CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, China.
Yabin WuAO Spine International, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
Hai V LeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Gianluca VadalàOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Amit JainDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andreas K DemetriadesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Edinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sam K ChoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Patrick C HsiehDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
Ashish DiwanSpine Labs, St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, NSW, Australia.
Tim YoonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sathish MuthuDepartment of Orthopedics, Government Karur Medical College and Hospital, Karur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ao Spine Knowledge Forum DegenerativeAO Spine International, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge translation from research to clinical practice can often be challenging, and practice modification patterns among surgeons may stem from a variety of sources, including personal experience, peer influence, ongoing education, and evolving research findings. Research question: This study aimed to investigate the adoption patterns amongst surgeons for newer innovations and to analyse the factors affecting the implementation of the same in clinical practice. We used the adoption of osteobiologics as a case example. Methods: An international expert survey was conducted among AO Spine users and members. The survey, comprising 30 items, explored surgeons' demographics, risk aversion, and factors influencing practice change. We categorized the innovation-adoptive nature of the surgeons and scored their risk-adoptive behaviour. Results: A total of 458 responses were received from surgeons across 81 countries including 433 male (95%), orthopaedic surgeons (n = 263; 57%) from university-affiliated hospitals (n = 185; 40%). Most were in the early majority phase of the innovation-adoption cycle (n = 174; 38%) with a majority in the 'high-moderate' risk-adoption category (n = 396; 86%). This risk adoption behaviour had a significant correlation with their appetite for innovation (r = 0.182,p=<0.001). About 67.9% of respondents preferred scientific literature and conference presentations showcasing solid clinical evidence to be the most influential factor in driving change in their clinical practice. Material logistics (55%) is considered an important barrier to practice modification followed by familiarity (50%) and financial reimbursements (25%). Discussion & conclusion: A complex interplay exists between risk-adoptive behaviour amongst surgeons and the factors influencing a change in their clinical practice. Although most surgeons were in the early adoptive phase in accepting the innovations into their clinical practice, they were also equally noted to be risk tolerant. Hence, a successful adoption of practice-changing innovation hinges on addressing not only logistical and financial challenges but also on providing robust scientific evidence to drive the necessary change in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adoption cycleChallengesPractice patternSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID40034491
PMCPMC11874865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.