ArticleBrain & spine2025
Diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: Systematic evaluation of CT head diagnostic accuracy and comparison with the 2022 NICE guidelines.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health system learning enables generalist neuroimaging models.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Inter-Rater Reliability of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Radiological Grading Scales: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Expanding the applications of artificial intelligence in emergency radiology: Advancing precision medicine and resource efficiency.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Real-world performance evaluation of a commercial deep learning model for intracranial hemorrhage detection.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Health system learning achieves generalist neuroimaging models.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high incidence, and morbidity. It has been suggested that a negative non-contrast CT head can rule out SAH if performed within 6 h of symptom onset. Research question: What is the sensitivity of CT head at ruling out SAH stratified by time-point, and what is the potential impact of omitting Lumbar Puncture (LP) from the diagnostic pathway? Material and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPEROID CRD42022379929). Three databases were searched, and articles published between January 2000-May 2022 included (Search date 27 Results: 63 articles were included (38,237 patients, 7673 with SAH). Pooled CT head sensitivity was 0.94 for excluding SAH (22 studies, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.90-0.97). At <6 h, CT head sensitivity was 0.995 (6 studies, 95% CI 0.941-1.000). Most studies (57.1%, n = 36/63) were classified as high risk of bias. If LP was removed from the diagnostic pathway in the UK, assuming an incidence of 4800 SAH per-year, 336 SAH would be missed per-year, 24 per-year if LP was removed for negative CT < 6 h (95% CI 0-278) and 58 per-year if mean sensitivity is used (95% CI 0-240). Discussion and conclusion: CT head appears to be highly sensitive at excluding SAH <6 h from symptom onset. High quality, prospective data is required to further established the utility of early (<6 h) negative CT head. We recommend that if there is strong clinical suspicion of SAH, yet CT head is reported negative <6 h of symptom onset, that a LP be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.