Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034490›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: Systematic evaluation of CT head diagnostic accuracy and comparison with the 2022 NICE guidelines.

Conor S Gillespie, John Gerrard Hanrahan, Roxana Mahdiyar, Keng Siang Lee, Mohammad Ashraf, Ali M Alam, Justyna O Ekert, Orla Mantle, Simon C Williams, Jonathan P Funnell and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Conor S GillespieDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
John Gerrard HanrahanDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
Roxana MahdiyarDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Keng Siang LeeDepartment of Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Mohammad AshrafDepartment of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Ali M AlamInstitute of Infection, Veterinary, and Ecological Science, University of Liverpool, UK.
Justyna O EkertDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Orla MantleDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Simon C WilliamsWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, UK.
Jonathan P FunnellWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), London, UK.
Nihal GurusingheDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Raghu VindlacheruvuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Barking, Havering and Redbridge, University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Peter C WhitfieldSouth West Neurosurgery Centre, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Rikin A TrivediDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Adel HelmyDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter J HutchinsonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage has a high incidence, and morbidity. It has been suggested that a negative non-contrast CT head can rule out SAH if performed within 6 h of symptom onset. Research question: What is the sensitivity of CT head at ruling out SAH stratified by time-point, and what is the potential impact of omitting Lumbar Puncture (LP) from the diagnostic pathway? Material and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPEROID CRD42022379929). Three databases were searched, and articles published between January 2000-May 2022 included (Search date 27 Results: 63 articles were included (38,237 patients, 7673 with SAH). Pooled CT head sensitivity was 0.94 for excluding SAH (22 studies, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.90-0.97). At <6 h, CT head sensitivity was 0.995 (6 studies, 95% CI 0.941-1.000). Most studies (57.1%, n = 36/63) were classified as high risk of bias. If LP was removed from the diagnostic pathway in the UK, assuming an incidence of 4800 SAH per-year, 336 SAH would be missed per-year, 24 per-year if LP was removed for negative CT < 6 h (95% CI 0-278) and 58 per-year if mean sensitivity is used (95% CI 0-240). Discussion and conclusion: CT head appears to be highly sensitive at excluding SAH <6 h from symptom onset. High quality, prospective data is required to further established the utility of early (<6 h) negative CT head. We recommend that if there is strong clinical suspicion of SAH, yet CT head is reported negative <6 h of symptom onset, that a LP be performed.

Indexed as

6 hComputed tomographyCTLPLumbar punctureSubarachnoid haemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID40034490
PMCPMC11872663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.