Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034349›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports2024

Deep brain stimulation versus nonsurgical treatment for severe Alzheimer's disease: A long-term retrospective cohort study.

Junpeng Xu, Bin Liu, Zhebin Feng, Xinguang Yu, Guosong Shang, Yang Liu, Yuxiang Sun, Haonan Yang, Yuhan Chen, Yanyang Zhang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Junpeng XuChinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Medical School, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9958-7819
Bin LiuChinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Medical School, Beijing, China.
Zhebin FengPLA 942 Hospital, Yinchuan, China.
Xinguang YuDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guosong ShangChinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Medical School, Beijing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuxiang SunHebei University, Baoding, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9533-5334
Haonan YangChinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Medical School, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9644-0071
Yuhan ChenThe First Clinical Medical College of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China.
Yanyang ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2162-7358
Zhiqi MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8535-4531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by significant neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disorders, with limited effectiveness of conservative drug treatments. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers a potential alternative. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of DBS versus conservative treatment in patients with severe AD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with severe AD diagnosed at the People's Liberation Army General Hospital from 2015 to 2022. Twenty patients received DBS, and twenty received conservative treatment. Treatment effects were assessed using standardized scales at three- and twelve-months post-treatment. Primary outcomes included changes in cognitive function [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale-Cognitive subscale, Clinical Dementia Rating). Secondary outcomes included quality of life, sleep quality, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and caregiver burden (Barthel Index, Functional Activity Questionnaire, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PDQI), Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)]. Results: DBS patients showed significantly greater improvements in MMSE, MoCA, FIM, and ZBI scores than controls, suggesting improved cognitive function and quality of life, and reduced caregiver burden (p < 0.05). Notably, DBS significantly reduced HAM-A, HAM-D, and PSQI scores, and improved NPI scores more than controls, indicating significant amelioration of neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disorders (p < 0.05). Conclusions: DBS is a safe and reversible treatment that potentially enhances cognitive function and quality of life in severe AD patients and alleviates caregiver burden. For the first time, we report that DBS also improves neuropsychiatric symptoms and sleep disorders, highlighting its clinical potential in AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseasedeep brain stimulationfornixneuropsychiatric symptomsnucleus basalis of Meynertsleep disorders

Identifiers

PMID40034349
PMCPMC11863731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.