ArticleHeliyon2025
Deriving analytical solutions using symbolic matrix structural analysis: Part 2 - Plane trusses.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deriving analytical solutions using symbolic matrix structural analysis for continuous beams.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deriving analytical solutions using symbolic matrix structural analysis: Part 2 - Plane trusses.Heliyon · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study extends the use of symbolic computation in matrix structural analysis to plane trusses, expanding on previous work that focused on continuous beams. We present a fully open-source MATLAB program, available on GitHub, that performs symbolic analysis of 2D trusses subjected to point loads, applicable to any truss configuration. Using the Symbolic Math Toolbox, the program derives closed-form analytical expressions for displacements, support reactions, and axial forces, providing deeper insight into structural behavior. A key advantage of the symbolic approach is its ability to perform sensitivity analysis efficiently by computing partial derivatives of structural responses with respect to input parameters. This feature enhances design exploration and optimization by allowing direct evaluation of parameter influences. Moreover, the framework is highly scalable, capable of generating symbolic solutions even for large-scale truss structures, something previously unattainable using traditional methods due to computational limitations. The tool serves both engineering practice and education, offering clear insights into parameter relationships and strengthening conceptual understanding in structural mechanics. To ensure accuracy, the symbolic results were rigorously validated against two commercial finite element software programs and results from the literature, with complete agreement. These validations confirm the reliability, scalability, and general applicability of the proposed methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.