ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Single-cell RNAseq reveals adverse metabolic transcriptional program in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma malignant cells.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic profiling of epigenetic regulators and metabolic reprogramming in human cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICA) is a highly aggressive primary liver cancer, which originates from the epithelial cells of the bile ducts. The transcriptional profile of metabolic enzymes was investigated at both bulk and single-cell levels in tumor samples from distinct ICA cohorts. In a training cohort (TCGA consortium), 16 genes encoding for metabolic enzymes were found overexpressed in cases with poor survival. A computed metabolic gene expression score was significantly associated with worse ICA prognosis at the univariate level (overall survival [OS] log-rank p = 8.2e-4). After adjusting for Ishak fibrosis score and tumor staging, the metabolic expression remained an independent predictor of poor prognosis (multivariate OS log-rank p = 0.01). Seven genes encoding key enzymes (FH, MAT2B, PLOD2, PLOD1, PDE6D, ALDOC, and NT5DC3) were validated as markers of the proliferative subclass of ICA in the GSE32225 dataset, related to poor prognosis. The metabolic score was significantly different between the inflammatory and proliferative subclasses in the validation cohort (p < 2.2e-16). At the single-cell level, in the tumor microenvironment of 10 ICA patients, these seven enzymes were predominantly expressed by malignant cells. The single-cell metabolic score was thus higher in malignant cells. This study identifies a metabolic transcriptional program linked to poor prognosis in ICA, independent of fibrosis and tumor staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.