ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Prediction of right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer based on computed tomography imaging histology.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes status prediction after neoadjuvant therapy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Radiomics nomogram from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative prediction of substantial lymphovascular space invasion in endometrial cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify risk factors for right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RRLNLN) metastasis using computed tomography (CT) imaging histology and clinical data from patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), ultimately developing a clinical prediction model. Methods: Data were collected from 370 patients who underwent surgical resection at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, from December 2014 to December 2020. Subsequently, the venous-stage chest-enhanced CT images of the patients were imported into 3DSlicer 4.11 software, allowing for the extraction of imaging histological features. Additionally, by combining the clinical data of the patients, single- and multifactor analyses were conducted to screen the risk factors and build a predictive model in the form of a nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC) was used as a discriminant for model accuracy, while differentiation and calibration methods were applied to further evaluate the model's accuracy. Finally, the Bootstrap resampling method was employed to repeat sampling 2,000 times to draw calibration curves, while the K-fold crossvalidation method was used for the internal validation of the prediction model. Results: The RRLNLN lymph node metastasis rate was 17.3%. Four significant factors-Maximum2DDiameterSlice, Mean, Imc1, and Dependence Entropy-were identified. Alignment diagrams were subsequently constructed, yielding an AUC of 0.938 and a C-index of 0.904 during internal validation. Conclusion: The model demonstrates high predictive accuracy, making it a valuable tool for guiding the development of preoperative protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.