ReviewJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Safety and efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections in basal thumb osteoarthritis; should we offer it or not?
Review in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What's New in Hand Surgery: Transformative advancements and Emerging Trends.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonsurgical therapeutic approaches for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA) often offer only inconsistent symptom relief and fail to restore hand function. Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have recently emerged as a promising alternative, with encouraging outcomes in knees and hips. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to highlight the safety and efficacy of PRP injections in thumb CMC OA. A systematic review was completed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. Primary outcomes focused on patients with basal thumb osteoarthritis treated with intra-articular PRP injections. Patient characteristics, product administration, functional outcomes and complications were analyzed as means of central tendency. A meta-analysis was performed focusing on pain relief and improvement in hand function. Seven articles were included, comprising 115 patients with an average age of 62.6 years, predominantly female (67.0 %). Patients received an average of 1.4 PRP injections per joint, with an average follow-up of 14.1 months. Control groups were administered corticosteroids, normal saline, and hyaluronic acid. All PRP-treated patients resumed their prior activities of daily living with a satisfaction rate at 73.7 % (n = 76). Statistically significant pain reduction (n = 98) and improvement in pinch strength were reported, while no statistically significant improvement in grip strength was observed (n = 39). No adverse events occurred, with only one complication (a palmar wrist ganglion) reported. Intra-articular PRP injections in thumb CMC OA yields favorable outcomes for pain relief and hand function without major complications. However, procedural and data heterogeneity affect reliability. Further randomized controlled trials comparing PRP and cortisone injections are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.