ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Impact of different 3D regions of interest on quantifying dynamic lumbar vertebral microstructure in ovariectomized rats-a micro-CT study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The selection of regions of interest (ROIs) is crucial for accurate microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Distinct ROI selection methods exist for lumbar vertebras in osteoporotic animal model research. However, whether different ROIs directly affect the results of quantitative micro-CT-based microarchitectural data is still unknown. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two commonly used ROIs of lumbar vertebras in ovariectomized (OVX) rats at different time points. Methods: Rats were randomly divided into the baseline group, the sham/OVX-operated groups, with 12- or 24-weeks sham (Sham 12w or Sham 24w)/12- or 24-weeks (OVX 12w or OVX 24w)-operated group ( Results: The results indicated that the Tb.N of baseline group rats for ROI 1 was significantly lower than that for ROI 2. The Tb.Th of rats of the Sham 12w and Sham 24w groups was significantly increased compared to that of the baseline group rats using the ROI 2 analysis. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) were significantly lower by the ROI 1 than by the ROI 2 in all groups. The BMD and BV/TV also showed a significant reduction at 24 weeks postoperatively compared with those at 12 weeks postoperatively. Bland-Altman analysis showed good consistency between the two different ROI selection methods. Conclusion: This study found that capturing peripheral trabeculas (overall ROI) does not explain the increased Tb.Th in healthy mice and decreased Tb.N in OVX mice; both findings indicate that this is evident in both ROI. Moreover, this study suggested the potential value of the central ROI (effective and quicker) for evaluating osteoporosis of the lumbar vertebras in OVX rats and provides a basis for analyzing the morphological changes of lumbar trabecular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.