ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Advancing Sustainability in Ophthalmic Surgeries and Interventions: A Narrative Review of Environmental Impact and Best Practices.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating environmental considerations in HTA: The strategy of the Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux (INESSS).International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2026Article
- Sustainability in vitreoretinal surgery: environmental impact and carbon emission reduction strategies.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
- From Innovation to Conservation: Sustainable Pathways in Vitreoretinal Practice.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare is a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the field of ophthalmology, particularly through high-volume surgeries such as cataract, glaucoma, and retina interventions, has a considerable environmental impact. This review explores the environmental consequences of ophthalmic surgeries, emphasizing recent research on carbon emissions, waste production, and resource use. It also examines current sustainable practices and suggests evidence-based recommendations to mitigate the carbon footprint of ophthalmic care. Sustainability has become a critical priority in healthcare, particularly in high-volume specialties like ophthalmology, which generate significant environmental impact through resource-intensive surgical procedures. This review examines the carbon footprint of key ophthalmic surgeries-cataract, glaucoma, and retina-and identifies primary sources of emissions, including single-use disposables, energy consumption, and the use of potent greenhouse gases such as sulfur hexafluoride (SF₆) in retina surgery. Strategies to mitigate these impacts are proposed, focusing on transitioning to reusable instruments and supplies, reducing pharmaceutical waste, optimizing energy use in surgical facilities, and considering air tamponade as a viable alternative to high global warming potential (GWP) gases in retina procedures. Case studies, such as the sustainable practices at Aravind Eye Hospital, illustrate the feasibility of combining high-quality ophthalmic care with environmental responsibility. By adopting evidence-based solutions, the field of ophthalmology can significantly reduce its ecological footprint, aligning with global sustainability initiatives while maintaining patient safety and surgical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.