ReviewJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025
Artificial Intelligence in Neuroendovascular Procedures.
Review in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time AI-Generated Guidewire-Out-of-View Notifications in Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: Higher Observed Rates Among Trainees.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Multimodal Deep Learning and Knowledge-Enhanced Intelligent Decision Support System for Pipeline Embolization Device Size Selection in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Flow-Directed Microcatheter Tip Markers.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- World's First Artificial Intelligence-Based Evaluation of Rist Catheter Stability in Transradial Procedures: A Feasibility Study.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Article
- Research progress in medical imaging for intracranial aneurysms: technological advances in diagnosis, management, and clinical integration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuroendovascular Therapy: Current Applications and Future Directions.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have significantly transformed neuroendovascular procedures, offering innovative solutions for image analysis, procedural assistance, and clinical decision-making. This review examines the current state and future potential of AI applications in neuroendovascular interventions, focusing on 3 topics: AI-based image recognition, real-time procedural assistance, and future developments. From a research perspective, deep learning algorithms have demonstrated reasonable accuracy in vascular structure analysis and device detection, successfully identifying critical conditions such as vascular perforation, aneurysm location, and vessel occlusions. Real-time AI assistance systems may have potential clinical utility in various procedures, including carotid artery stenting, aneurysm coiling, and liquid embolization, potentially enhancing procedural safety and operator awareness. The future of AI in neuroendovascular procedures shows promise in integration with robotic systems and applications in medical education. While current systems have some limitations, ongoing technological advances suggest an expanding role of AI in enhancing procedural safety, standardization, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.