Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40034095›Full record

ReviewJournal of Korean medical science2025

Statistical Methods for Baseline Adjustment and Cohort Analysis in Korean National Health Insurance Claims Data: A Review of PSM, IPTW, and Survival Analysis With Future Directions.

Dong Wook Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Korean medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dong Wook KimDepartment of Information and Statistics, Department of Bio & Medical Big Data, Research Institute of Natural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea. kimdw2269@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4478-3794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of health insurance claims data has expanded significantly, enabling researchers to conduct epidemiological studies on a large scale. This review examines key statistical methods for addressing baseline differences and conducting cohort analyses using Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting are widely used to mitigate selection bias and enhance causal inference in observational studies. These methods help improve study validity by balancing covariates between treatment and control groups. Additionally, survival analysis techniques, such as the Cox proportional hazards model, are essential for assessing time-to-event outcomes and estimating hazard ratios while accounting for censoring. However, the application of these statistical methods is accompanied by challenges, including unmeasured confounding, instability in weight estimation, and violations of model assumptions. To address these limitations, emerging approaches, such as Doubly robust estimation, machine learning-based causal inference, and the marginal structural model, have gained prominence. These techniques offer greater flexibility and robustness in real-world data analysis. Future research should focus on refining methodologies for integrating high-dimensional health datasets and leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance predictive modeling and causal inference. Furthermore, the expansion of international collaborations and the adoption of standardized data models will facilitate large-scale multi-center studies. Ethical considerations, including data privacy and algorithmic transparency, should also be prioritized to ensure responsible data use. Maximizing the utility of health insurance claims data requires interdisciplinary collaboration, methodological advancements, and the implementation of rigorous statistical techniques to support evidence-based healthcare policy and improve public health outcomes.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalSurvival AnalysisCohort StudiesHumansNational Health ProgramsPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRepublic of KoreaCox Proportional Hazard ModelInverse Probability of Treatment WeightingKorean National Health Insurance Claims DataPropensity ScoreSelection Bias

Identifiers

PMID40034095
PMCPMC11876781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.