ReviewThe world journal of men's health2025
Recent Guidelines and Perspectives for Varicocele: A Clinical Consensus and Recommendations from the Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology.
Review in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is Varicocele Truly Unilateral? Contralateral Involvement and Bilateral Testicular Effects in Male Infertility: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Adipose-derived stem cells-conditioned medium (ADMSCs-CM) improves testicular function and sperm DNA damage via Nrf2 antioxidant signaling pathways in rat unilateral varicocele.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Oxidative Damage, Antioxidant Capacity, and Apoptotic Activation in Varicocele: Biochemical Evidence of Improvement After Surgical Repair.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Adolescent varicocele, a Gordian knot: A comprehensive review of clinical perspectives and future directions.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Why Varicoceles Recur: Missed Venous Anatomy and Contemporary Strategies for Salvage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Microsurgical varicocelectomy versus laparoscopic surgery versus embolization for varicocele: a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Numerical simulation of gonadal vein hemodynamics in nutcracker syndrome-associated varicocele: effects of Valsalva maneuver and clinical implications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Varicocele is a common urological disease and varicocele has long been recognized as a condition that could affect male fertility. Although varicocele is the most common surgically correctable cause of male infertility, not all varicoceles require treatment. Because the appropriate diagnosis and management of varicoceles remain less clear in many patients, it is important to diagnose clinically significant varicoceles that can benefit from treatment. Even in the era of widespread assisted reproductive techniques, varicocele has substantial implications in infertility treatment. The Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) has sought to develop guidelines for varicocele treatment tailored to clinical practices in Korea. This review summarizes the latest evidence for varicocele treatment, including clinical practice guidelines from various international professional societies, and represents the consensus opinion of experts within the KSSMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.