ArticleThe world journal of men's health2025
Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium and Maculopathy in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot Proteomic Analysis of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles Supports the "Toxic Urine Hypothesis" as a Vicious Cycle in Refractory IC/BPS Pathogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) is the only pharmacological intervention approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treating interstitial cystitis (IC) to date. However, PPS may induce an adverse event, maculopathy, which can be a significant challenge. To determine the risk of PPS-induced maculopathy in patients with IC. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed and Embase were systematically searched through July 2024. Two authors also independently and manually searched all relevant studies. We included national level cohort studies using healthcare claim big data or real-world data with the following criteria: (1) patients diagnosed with IC; (2) interventions included PPS as an active treatment; (3) comparisons were specified as non-PPS interventions; and (4) the primary outcome of interest was the risk of maculopathy. The pairwise meta-analysis was performed to compare the PPS treatment group with control used in IC. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR), and proportional report ratio (PRR) of maculopathy after receiving the PPS treatment, as compared to non-PPS interventions.
resultsA comprehensive literature search was conducted, and identified 6 studies with 411,098 patients. The pooled risk for maculopathy due to PPS in patients with IC was significant (HR, 1.678; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.066-2.642]). The heterogeneity test produced a Higgins'
conclusionsThis is the first study to investigate the relationship between PPS and its association with the risk of maculopathy in patients with IC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.