ArticleJournal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]2025
Advanced 3D Insights Into the Marginal and Internal Fit of Ceramic-Filled Hybrid Endocrowns With Variable Preparations.
Article in Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional Printed Materials for Definitive Ceramic and Resin Restorations: A Scoping Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Influence of printing orientation on the mechanical and surface characteristics of a novel 3D-printed definitive resin-based composite.Odontology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the influence of different preparation designs on the marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed permanent endocrowns using circumferential 3D analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsMaxillary right first molar typodont teeth were prepared with four designs (n = 12); Group 1-butt joint & 2 mm pulp chamber, Group 2-butt joint & 4 mm pulp chamber, Group 3-shoulder & 2 mm pulp chamber, and Group 4-shoulder & 4 mm pulp chamber. Teeth were scanned, replicated as 3D-printed master dies, and restored with 3D-printed ceramic-filled hybrid endocrowns. After seating with Fit Checker, superimposed scans were analyzed circumferentially at standard points. Marginal, internal, pulp chamber, and overall gap values were measured from mesiodistal, buccolingual, and oblique sections. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way anova and post hoc Tukey tests (α = 0.05).
resultsMargin design and pulp chamber depth interactions revealed significant differences (p < 0.05). The least marginal fit was in Group 2, while the best internal and overall fit was in Group 3 (p < 0.05).
conclusionDifferent preparation designs have an impact on the fit of endocrowns. A shoulder margin design and a 2-mm pulp chamber depth exhibited a better internal fit of 3D-printed ceramic-filled hybrid endocrowns through circumferential 3D analysis. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Circumferential 3D analysis reveals that variable preparation designs significantly influence the fit of endocrowns, guiding clinicians in selecting optimal designs for improved clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.