Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033821›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

International consensus principles for the sustainable harvest of polar bears.

Eric V Regehr, Erik M Andersen, Melissa P Galicia, Samuel A Iverson, Lindsey S Mangipane, Evan S Richardson, Fernando Ugarte, Susannah P Woodruff

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. International consensus principles for the sustainable harvest of polar bears.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eric V RegehrPolar Science Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4487-3105
Erik M AndersenMarine Mammals Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Melissa P GaliciaCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Samuel A IversonCanadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Québec, Canada.
Lindsey S MangipaneMarine Mammals Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
Evan S RichardsonWildlife Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Fernando UgarteGreenland Institute of Natural Resources, Nuuk, Greenland.
Susannah P WoodruffMarine Mammals Management, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

Funding

Environment and Climate Change Canada 3000771368PinngortitaleriffikUniversity of WashingtonU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilateral agreements are required for the effective management of large carnivores with ranges that cross geopolitical boundaries. This is particularly important for species subject to rapid changes in distribution or demographic status due to climate warming. We considered 3 international consensus principles for the sustainable harvest of polar bears (Ursus maritimus), a circumpolar species threatened by sea-ice loss and harvested by Indigenous Peoples for subsistence. First, we defined a biologically sustainable harvest as one that occurs at a rate likely to maintain subpopulation abundance above maximum net productivity level. Second, we determined the type of scientific assessment needed to identify a sustainable harvest, which includes synthesizing or collecting information on habitat conditions, spatial population structure, and human-caused removals and conducting a field study to estimate ecological indices or demographic parameters. Third, we delineated the components of a sustainable harvest management regime, which include implementing harvest at a biologically sustainable rate, having the ability to monitor and adjust harvest levels, and following a state-dependent management approach. The consensus principles are supported by the 5 nations with polar bears (Canada, Greenland, Norway, Russia, and the United States) under an international treaty. They are designed to provide consistent guidance while allowing different jurisdictions the flexibility to tailor harvest strategies to their situations. Adapting similar principles to other systems could help mitigate the global conservation crisis for large carnivores.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesUrsidaeAnimalsInternational Cooperationcaceríacalentamiento globalcapturaclimate warmingconservación de faunagestión dependiente del Estadohabitat lossharvesthuntingpérdida del hábitatstate‐dependent managementsustainabilitysustentabilidadwildlife conservation

Identifiers

PMID40033821
PMCPMC12309652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.