SynthesisClinical and translational science2025
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Combination Therapies: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Enable Combination Therapies To Enhance Disease Prevention and Flare Control in Rheumatoid Arthritis.ACS central science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are several disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs currently available to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the optimal combination therapy with methotrexate for treating RA remains unclear. We aimed to identify combination therapies with high-efficacy and safety by employing the Bayesian method in a network meta-analysis. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Ichushi web, and PMDA review reports and application materials through October 2020, and found 86 randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy outcome was the 50% improvement rate according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR50), and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of serious adverse events. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% credible intervals (CrIs) between each treatment, and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score for each treatment to rank disease-modifying antirheumatic drug combinations. Individually, most disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs combined with methotrexate are more likely to achieve ACR50 than methotrexate monotherapy, with significant differences (p < 0.05), whereas the incidence of serious adverse events was not significantly different compared with methotrexate monotherapy (p > 0.05). Infliximab combined with methotrexate had the highest efficacy ranking (OR = 10.53, 95% CrI: [3.20, 42.87], SUCRA score: 0.884), and etanercept combined with methotrexate had the highest safety ranking (OR = 0.29, 95% CrI: [0.03, 2.04], SUCRA score: 0.893). Comprehensive cluster analysis revealed that the combination of etanercept, an Fc-fusion protein targeting tumor necrosis factor α, with methotrexate demonstrated higher efficacy and safety. These findings could support the selection of combination therapies for the treatment of RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.