ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025
A state-of-the-art review of registries in spinal muscular atrophy: A valuable resource for clinical research.
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy: Updated real-world practical considerations.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Advancing neuromuscular disease research through real-world data: Challenges and lessons learned.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- The evolving therapeutic landscape of spinal muscular atrophy - A scoping review of investigational agents, emerging delivery technologies and strategic innovations.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- A Psychometric Evaluation of Maximum Phonation Time and S/Z Ratio as Pragmatic Outcome Measures of Bulbar Function in Adults With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Muscle & nerve · 2026Observational
- Therapeutic advances in spinal muscular atrophy: a review of clinical, safety, and economic considerations.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Bridging science and hope: the evolving story of gene therapy for neuromuscular diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- REGISTRE SMA FRANCE: A nationwide observational registry of patients with spinal muscular atrophy in France.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2025Observational
- Modifying disease registries to address the evolving field in rare diseases: the iSMAc/ITASMAc experience in spinal muscular atrophy.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since 2016/17, three disease modifying therapies for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have been translated into clinical practice. This has driven the implementation of newborn screening to transform health outcomes and clinical practice. SMA registries have provided important sources of data on the evolution of novel phenotypes within the therapeutic era, treatment patterns, epidemiology, genotype-phenotype correlations, care and lived experiences of people living with SMA, to enrich knowledge and learnings of the condition in this changed landscape. In this state-of-the-art review, we consider the utility and outcomes of SMA registries and evaluate their role and importance. In 2024 there are more than 35 national registries cataloguing over 8000 individuals with SMA. Additional registries are operated by advocacy groups and pharmaceutical companies, compiling data for more than 10,000 individuals with this condition. This review highlights the essential role of registries in supporting clinical trial recruitment, defining the changing incidence and prevalence of SMA in an age of reproductive carrier and newborn screening, establishing natural history data, contributing to post market drug surveillance, assessing real world clinical and cost effectiveness and capturing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and experience measures (PREMS). Whilst their utility is broad, barriers to effective data curation and management are evaluated including challenges of data curation and fragmentation, quality and sharing, alongside resource constraints and sustainability. Strategies to enhance the value of registries include the imperative to collaborate across clinical research networks and the value of interoperability, enabled by standardization of data collection and entry, sharing procedures and public and patient involvement. As new phenotypes and unmet needs emerge in the post therapeutic era, registries remain central tools in generating new insights now and into the future and are poised to respond meaningfully to the priorities of individuals living with SMA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.