ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
A National Study Among Diverse US Populations of Exposure to Prescription Medications with Evidence-Based Pharmacogenomic Information.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessing the Frequency, Prescribing Patterns, and Characteristics of Patients Receiving Drugs with Pharmacogenomic (PGx) Guidelines Through an EMR: Follow-Up Analysis 5 Years Later.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Progress in Pharmacogenomics Implementation in the United States: Barrier Erosion and Remaining Challenges.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tailoring pharmacogenomic (PGx) implementation to diverse populations is vital to promoting health equity. We assessed prescriptions for medications with potentially actionable PGx information to identify patient characteristics associated with differential PGx medication exposure. We analyzed the nationally-representative MEPS dataset of adults who reported receiving prescriptions between 2014 and 2021. PGx medications include those the FDA and CPIC designate as having drug-gene associations supported by scientific evidence. With the primary outcome being PGx prescriptions, we performed Poisson regression adjusted for all other relevant covariates. In our final population (N = 119,722, 72% White/20% Black/4% Asian/8% Hispanic), 61% were prescribed a PGx medication, 56% were female, and 97% held health insurance coverage. Adults with private health insurance (65%) or public Medicaid/Medicare coverage (32%) were more likely to have PGx prescriptions than the uninsured (3%). Individuals with cardiovascular conditions [adjusted IRR (aIRR) = 1.45, 95% CI 1.41, 1.48], high cholesterol [aIRR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.35, 1.40], high blood pressure [aIRR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.12, 1.16], and cancer [aIRR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00, 1.04] were more likely to receive PGx prescriptions. Self-reported Blacks were less likely than Whites to receive PGx medications [aIRR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.90, 0.94], and among those with health conditions, the likelihood of PGx medication exposure for underrepresented groups (Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians) was lower than for Whites. Our study using a comprehensive list of PGx medications in a nationally representative dataset indicates that certain populations are differentially exposed to genomically informed medications. This may suggest that if implementing a pharmacogenomics program based on reactive testing initiated by a prescription, a small underrepresentation of the Black population could be expected because of an underlying prescription disparity. Secondly, if implementing a pharmacogenomics program based on targeted preemptive testing, using clinical indication/comorbidity may be a reasonable way to enrich the population for prescriptions that would benefit from genotype tailoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.