ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Robotics-assisted surgery in gynecology: A single-center experience with the Hugo™ RAS system in India.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of global experiences with Medtronic's Hugo™ robotic system for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Initial experience with the Carina™ platform for gasless transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma: an early feasibility report.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy using the Hugo-RAS system: initial series with no experience in robotic surgery.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Article
- Multicenter evaluation of the DEXTER® Robotic Surgery System for Total Hysterectomy with Adnexal Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Observational
- The use of robotics in gynecology and reproductive medicine.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotics-assisted surgery (RAS) offers several advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery, such as enhanced precision, dexterity, and ergonomics, and allows stable movements with tremor filtering and motion scaling. The new multi-modular Hugo™ RAS system is commercially available in certain countries and is used in urological, gynecological, and general surgical procedures.
objectivesTo document the experience with the use of the Hugo™ RAS system in 20 patients who underwent surgery for various gynecological conditions at a hospital in Hyderabad, India.
designReal-world single-center study.
methodsTwenty patients (45.3 ± 6.5 years) who were admitted to a tertiary care center (September 2022-2023) underwent hysterectomy (
resultsThe mean docking time was 6.3 ± 2.0 min, and the mean console time was 86.9 ± 20.3 min. Blood loss (intraoperative and postoperative drain) was 103.5 ± 62.4 mL, not requiring blood transfusion for any patient. Per hospital norms, each patient had a hospital stay lasting for 2 days. None of the patients experienced immediate postoperative complications. Minor late complications were observed in two patients. Postoperative pain perception decreased with time. VAS scores were 3.2 ± 0.4 (1 h), 2.2 ± 0.4 (6 h), and 1.0 ± 0.0 (12 h), and no pain was perceived 1 week after surgery.
conclusionBased on initial experience, the Hugo™ RAS system provides favorable results for gynecological patients, with benefits including efficient docking time, short surgery duration, minimal blood loss, short hospital stay, few postoperative complications, and low pain perception. Future studies comparing the Hugo™ RAS system with other robotic surgical platforms in gynecological procedures are essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.