ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Pre-analytical pitfalls: How blood collection tubes influence exercise-induced cell-free DNA concentrations.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Female endurance athletes show a reduced plasma cell-free DNA response to all-out and 3-h cycling compared to male counterparts.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Biomarkers as Temporal Signals: A Decision-Linked Multi-Layer Framework for Exercise Recovery, Overload, and Adaptation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Pre-analytical pitfalls: How blood collection tubes influence exercise-induced cell-free DNA concentrations.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising biomarker for physiological stress, including exercise-induced responses. However, the lack of standardization in blood collection tubes (BCTs) for quantification of cfDNA hampers inter-study comparisons. In this study, we assessed the impact of different BCTs on exercise-induced cfDNA dynamics. Eleven participants [25 (SD 2.3) years of age] performed three different treadmill exercise protocols, including an all-out test and combinations of constant and interval load. Blood samples were collected before, 5 min and 30 min post-exercise using EDTA, lithium-heparin (LH) and serum BCTs. Concentrations of cfDNA were quantified using quantitative PCR. The cfDNA increased significantly across all protocols and BCTs. A significant effect of BCT on cfDNA concentrations (P = 0.034) was found, with serum showing higher concentrations than EDTA and LH. Although absolute differences from pre- to post-exercise were comparable across BCTs (P = 0.476), fold changes differed significantly (P = 0.012), with the highest observed in EDTA and the lowest in serum. Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated better agreement between EDTA and LH compared with serum. Significant correlations of cfDNA with energy expenditure and peak oxygen uptake were found. These correlations were stronger in EDTA and LH than in serum. Our findings highlight the crucial influence of BCT choice on cfDNA measurements in exercise settings. Given that EDTA and LH reflected exercise load better, they could be preferred for exercise physiology research. This work underscores the need to account for the choice of BCT to improve data comparability across studies. Additionally, these findings might have broader implications for clinical settings where cfDNA is used as a biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.