Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033495›Full record

ArticleCurrent diabetes reviews2026

Protective Effect of

Phool Chandra, Mohammad Kaleem, Neetu Sachan, Anurag Verma, Atul Kabra

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current diabetes reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phool ChandraDepartment of Pharmacology, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, U.P, 244001, India.
Mohammad KaleemSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, IFTM University, Lodhipur Rajput, Delhi Road (NH- 24), Moradabad, U.P, 244102, India.
Neetu SachanMaharana Pratap College of Pharmacy, Mandhana, Kanpur, U.P, 209217, India.
Anurag VermaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, U.P, 244001, India.
Atul KabraUniversity Institute of Pharma Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140301, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedicago sativa

methodsThe wounds were created by excision (n=30) and incision (n=30) in rats. The Group IIV were diabetic rats treated with simple ointment BP, 10% weight-based povidone-iodine (10% PI), ointment of 5% w/w EEMS (5% w/w OEEMS), and 10% w/w EEMS (10% w/w OEEMS). Group 1 acted as a control and was treated with simple ointment BP. The wound area in the diabetic control groups was 292.33 ± 0.8 mm2 on the 18th day.

resultsRats treated with 10% PI, 5% OEEMS, and 10% OEEMS showed a significant reduction in wound area of 68.33 ± 1.29, 248.33 ± 1.30, and 61 ± 1.91 mm

conclusionThe results demonstrated that the OEEMS has potent wound-healing properties in diabetic rats.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalMedicago sativaPlant ExtractsSurgical WoundWound HealingAnimalsMalePhytotherapyRatsRats, WistarPlant Extractsalfalfadiabetic ratsexcision woundincision wound.Medicago sativawound healing

Identifiers

PMID40033495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.