ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2025
Gastrointestinal toxicity of antibody-drug conjugates: a pharmacovigilance study using the FAERS database.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: From Mechanistic Insights to Clinical Management.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Immuno-cytotoxic convergence: integrating antibody‒drug conjugates and immunofusion proteins to overcome resistance in gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Real-world safety of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab in advanced urothelial carcinoma: evidence from VigiBase and FAERS.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Single-Agent and Associated Therapies with Monoclonal Antibodies: What About Follicular Lymphoma?Cancers · 2025Review
- Disproportionality Analysis of Gastrointestinal Adverse Events Associated With Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibody-drug conjugate (ADC) product specifications identify gastrointestinal adverse reactions. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of comparative studies pertaining to these side effects of similar medications. Special attention is warranted for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) affecting the gastrointestinal system that are inadequately documented in the drug literature.
aimsUtilizing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), data mining was conducted to analyze gastrointestinal adverse reactions associated with ADCs. This analysis aimed to provide evidence supporting the safe use of ADCs in medical institutions.
methodsWe utilized the Openvigil 2.1 platform to extract adverse event data reported for each ADC from the FAERS database, covering the period from the drug's launch until the second quarter of 2024. For data analysis, we employed the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) methods.
resultsA total of 23,886 adverse event reports were retrieved, with nine ADCs identified as the primary suspected drugs, including 1,517 reports of gastrointestinal adverse events linked to ADCs. The average patient age was 59.69 years, with a higher prevalence of female patients (919 patients, 60.58%) than male patients (319 patients, 24.32%). The gastrointestinal toxicity intensity, ranked from highest to lowest, was as follows: inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO) with ROR = 11.12 and PRR = 10.68, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) with ROR = 7.87 and PRR = 7.54, polatuzumab vedotin (PV) with ROR = 6.47 and PRR = 6.20, brentuximab vedotin (BV) with ROR = 5.79 and PRR = 5.61, sacituzumab govitecan (SG) with ROR = 5.19 and PRR = 4.61, mirvetuximab soravtansine (MS) with ROR = 4.37 and PRR = 3.80, trastuzumab deruxtecan (TD) with ROR = 4.22 and PRR = 3.63, trastuzumab emtansine (TE) with ROR = 3.93 and PRR = 3.85, and enfortumab vedotin (EV) with ROR = 3.26 and PRR = 3.02. Adverse events resulted in 237 deaths, 43 life-threatening cases, and 439 initial or prolonged hospitalizations, with TD being the top ranking for deaths and hospitalizations, followed by TE, which presented the highest mortality rate due to adverse events. The most frequent adverse events were nausea (506 cases), diarrhea (262 cases), vomiting (216 cases), ascites (112 cases), colitis (90 cases), pancreatitis (52 cases), and intestinal obstruction (37 cases).
conclusionsADCs may increase the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events and thus require vigilant monitoring in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.