Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033452›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Coarse matching was sufficient to capture attention by working memory representations unless matching features with the target.

Cenlou Hu, Ziwen Luo, Sai Huang, Bao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cenlou Hu *Department of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Ziwen Luo *Changde Vocational Technical College, Changde, 415000, China.
Sai HuangDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. huangsai@gzhu.edu.cn.
Bao ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. zhangbao@gzhu.edu.cn.

Funding

Plan Project for Guangdong Science and Technology 2024A1111120020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn most theoretical frameworks, the effectiveness of attentional selection relies significantly on the perceptual similarity between the target template and visual input. Nevertheless, ambiguity exists surrounding whether attentional capture triggered by irrelevant representations in Working Memory (WM) is influenced by the perceptual similarity levels of features between WM content and its matching distractors.

methodsWe designed a hybrid WM and visual search task, varying such perceptual similarity of colors across three levels: exact, high-similar, and low-similar matching. To quantify the extent of the capture effect, we compared these conditions against a neutral baseline (i.e., completely different color) using eye movement and behavioral data in two experiments.

resultsWe consistently observed robust attentional capture effects across two experiments, evident in both eye movement indices and manual reaction times. In Experiment 1, where WM representations solely matched features to visual search distractors (task-irrelevant scenario), we found that changes in perceptual similarity did not influence attentional capture. Conversely, in Experiment 2, where WM representations had the potential to match the visual search target (task-relevant scenario), we observed a significantly more robust attentional capture effect for high-similar matching compared to low-similar matching conditions.

conclusionsThese findings imply that coarse matching between distractors and WM contents is sufficient to capture attention, unless the matching features potentially correspond to the visual target. Furthermore, task relevance sharpens perceptual sensitivity to visual input, highlighting distinct mechanisms underlying attentional capture by irrelevant representations and target templates within WM.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultEye MovementsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultMemory-driven attentional capturePerceptual similarityTask-relevanceWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID40033452
PMCPMC11877691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.