SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Effects of brain-computer interface based training on post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07327710 (Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface Combined With Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Peripheral Facial Palsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interface Combined With Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Peripheral Facial Palsy
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of brain-computer interface-coupled robotic rehabilitation, robot-assisted therapy, and motor imagery for upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interface-Based Interventions for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Poststroke Hemiplegia: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of remote rehabilitation therapy for upper limb dysfunction following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of brain-computer interface training on cognitive function in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of Brain-Computer Interface Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of brain-computer interface-based rehabilitation on upper limb function, activities of daily living, and adverse events in patients with early stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of various acupuncture courses for upper limb motor dysfunction after ischemic stroke: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of brain-computer interface-based rehabilitation on lower limb function and activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Effect of upper-limb robot-assisted therapy combined with pneumatic gloves on upper limb function in young and middle-aged stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Unveiling the upper-limb functional recovery mechanisms in stroke patients using brain-machine interfaces: a near-infrared functional imaging-based study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Intermittent theta burst stimulation enhances the efficacy of brain-computer interface in upper limb rehabilitation post-stroke.Frontiers in neurologyTrial
- Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface (MI-BCI)-Assisted Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation for Acute Stroke During Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Prospective Feasibility Study with Economic Evaluation Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Feedback-Enhanced Virtual Reality Upper-Limb Training With Body Position Measurement in Healthy Adults: Development and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Mapping knowledge structure and emerging trends in non-invasive brain-computer interface for stroke rehabilitation.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Brain-Computer Interface-Controlled Hand Robot Training on Post-Stroke Recovery of Upper Limb Motor Functions: A Meta-Analysis of Dose-Matched Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Reopening Motor Learning Windows: Targeted Re-Engagement of Latent Pathways via Non-Invasive Neuromodulation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- EEG-based predictors of motor recovery during immersive VR-BCI rehabilitation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Brain-computer interface technology for motor rehabilitation in severe stroke: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Closed-loop brain-computer interfaces for post-stroke sensorimotor loop restoration.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious research has used the brain-computer interface (BCI) to promote upper-limb motor rehabilitation. However, the results of these studies were variable, leaving efficacy unclear.
objectivesThis review aims to evaluate the effects of BCI-based training on post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation and identify potential factors that may affect the outcome.
designA meta-analysis including all available randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) that reported the efficacy of BCI-based training on upper-limb motor rehabilitation after stroke. DATA SOURCES AND
methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science before September 15, 2024, for relevant studies. The primary efficacy outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper extremity (FMA-UE). RevMan 5.4.1 with a random effect model was used for data synthesis and analysis. Mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were calculated.
resultsTwenty-one RCTs (n = 886 patients) were reviewed in the meta-analysis. Compared with control, BCI-based training exerted significant effects on FMA-UE (MD = 3.69, 95%CI 2.41-4.96, P < 0.00001, moderate-quality evidence), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) (MD = 5.00, 95%CI 2.14-7.86, P = 0.0006, low-quality evidence), and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) (MD = 2.04, 95%CI 0.25-3.82, P = 0.03, high-quality evidence). Additionally, BCI-based training was effective on FMA-UE for both subacute (MD = 4.24, 95%CI 1.81-6.67, P = 0.0006) and chronic patients (MD = 2.63, 95%CI 1.50-3.76, P < 0.00001). BCI combined with functional electrical stimulation (FES) (MD = 4.37, 95%CI 3.09-5.65, P < 0.00001), robots (MD = 2.87, 95%CI 0.69-5.04, P = 0.010), and visual feedback (MD = 4.46, 95%CI 0.24-8.68, P = 0.04) exhibited significant effects on FMA-UE. BCI combined with FES significantly improved FMA-UE for both subacute (MD = 5.31, 95%CI 2.58-8.03, P = 0.0001) and chronic patients (MD = 3.71, 95%CI 2.44-4.98, P < 0.00001), and BCI combined with robots was effective for chronic patients (MD = 1.60, 95%CI 0.15-3.05, P = 0.03). Better results may be achieved with daily training sessions ranging from 20 to 90 min, conducted 2-5 sessions per week for 3-4 weeks.
conclusionsBCI-based training may be a reliable rehabilitation program to improve upper-limb motor impairment and function.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration ID: CRD42022383390.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.