ArticlePlant methods2025
Swin-Unet++: a study on phenotypic parameter analysis of cabbage seedling roots.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in root phenotyping: high-throughput imaging, computational tools, and integrative approaches for crop improvement.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- A systematic comparison of transformers and ConvNets for root segmentation across nine datasets.Plant methods · 2026Article
- LenRuler: a rice-centric method for automated radicle length measurement with multicrop validation.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs an important economic crop, the growth status of the root system of cabbage directly affects its overall health and yield. To monitor the root growth status of cabbage seedlings during their growth period, this study proposes a new network architecture called Swin-Unet++. This architecture integrates the Swin-Transformer module and residual networks and uses attention mechanisms to replace traditional convolution operations for feature extraction. It also adopts the residual concept to fuse contextual information from different levels, addressing the issue of insufficient feature extraction for the thin and mesh-like roots of cabbage seedlings.
resultsCompared with other backbone high-precision semantic segmentation networks, SwinUnet + + achieves superior segmentation results. The results show that the accuracy of Swin-Unet + + in root system segmentation tasks reached as high as 98.19%, with a model parameter of 60 M and an average response time of 29.5 ms. Compared with the classic Unet network, the mIoU increased by 1.08%, verifying that the Swin-Transformer and residual networks can accurately extract the fine-grained features of roots. Furthermore, when images after different semantic segmentations are compared to locate the root position through contours, Swin-Unet + + has the best positioning effect. On the basis of the root pixels obtained from semantic segmentation, the calculated maximum root length, extension width, and root thickness are compared with actual measurements. The resulting goodness of fit R² values are 94.82%, 94.43%, and 86.45%, respectively. Verifying the effectiveness of this network in extracting the phenotypic traits of cabbage seedling roots.
conclusionsThe Swin-Unet + + framework developed in this study provides a new technique for the monitoring and analysis of cabbage root systems, ultimately leading to the development of an automated analysis platform that offers technical support for intelligent agriculture and efficient planting practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.