Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033436›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025

A school-based intervention to improve mental health outcomes for children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI): feasibility cluster randomised trial.

Cathy Williams, Anna Pease, Trudy Goodenough, Katie Breheny, Beverly Shirkey, Rose Watanabe, Parisa Sinai, Manmita Rai, Innes C Cuthill, Mark Mumme and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cathy WilliamsBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. Cathy.Williams@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9133-2021
Anna PeaseBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Trudy GoodenoughBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katie BrehenyDepartment of Health Economics, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Beverly ShirkeyBristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rose WatanabeBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Parisa SinaiBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Manmita RaiBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Innes C CuthillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Mark MummePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Andrew W BoydUK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cassandra Wyeauthorsalouduk.co.uk, Bristol, UK.
Chris MetcalfeBristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Daisy GauntBristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kate BarnesSomerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK.
Siobhan RattiganSomerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK.
Stephanie WestUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
John FerrisCheltenham and Gloucester NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, UK.
Jay SelfUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral visual impairment (CVI) refers to brain-related vision difficulties, which are often undiagnosed and may lead to poor mental health outcomes. We have developed an intervention to improve mental health outcomes for affected children, and it requires evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of methods proposed for a future definitive cluster randomised trial.

methodsThis 18-month study took place in South West England, UK, between 2019 and 2021 including a 6-month pause due to the COVID pandemic. Participants were children aged 7-10 years in mainstream primary schools and their teachers and parents. We recruited head teachers on behalf of their school. The intervention was a resource pack for teachers explaining about CVI, providing universal and targeted strategies to help children with CVI and the offer of CVI assessments at the local eye clinic. The control schools continued with usual practice. Our objectives were to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment and data collection, attrition, acceptability of the study methods and implementation of the intervention. We conducted a process evaluation including interviews and questionnaires.

resultsWe sent invitation letters to 297 schools, received responses to 6% and recruited 40% of these (7 schools, 1015 children). Parents of 36/1015 (3.5%) children opted out. Baseline data were collected from teachers for 94% children, and 91% children completed self-report questionnaires; parent-report questionnaires were returned for 19% of children. During the exceptional circumstance of the COVID pandemic, two schools left the study, and many children were not attending school, meaning follow-up data were received from 32% of children, 16% of teachers and 14% of parents. Interview data indicated that the intervention was acceptable, and teachers would have preferred on-site eye tests to the offer of a clinic appointment and a clear timetable for study events. Teachers in intervention schools reported expected changes in the children's and their own behaviour. There was some contamination between study arms.

conclusionsA full-scale trial would be feasible, enhanced by insights from this feasibility trial, in non-pandemic times. Sharing these data with teachers, education policymakers and parents is planned to refine the design.

trial registrationISRCTN13762177.

Indexed as

Cerebral visual impairmentChildrenCluster randomised trialFeasibility trialSpecial educational needs (SEN)

Identifiers

PMID40033436
PMCPMC11874832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.