Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40033433›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2025

Patient and clinician experiences with the implementation of telemedicine and related adaptations in office-based buprenorphine treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

Melissa Davoust, Angela R Bazzi, Samantha Blakemore, Juliana Blodgett, Anna Cheng, Sarah Fielman, Kara M Magane, Jacqueline Theisen, Richard Saitz, Alicia S Ventura and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Melissa DavoustDepartment of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. mdavoust@bu.edu.
Angela R BazziDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Samantha BlakemoreGrayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Juliana BlodgettDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Anna ChengBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Sarah FielmanDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Kara M MaganeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Jacqueline TheisenBoston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Richard SaitzDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Alicia S VenturaGrayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Zoe M WeinsteinGrayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 East Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

Funding

Project-005UL1TR001430 · NCATS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BAIR-MERRITT, MEGAN H, CENTER, DAVID M. · 2015 to 2024
$52.3M
Integrated Care for Addiction, HIV and HCV Research and Education (ICAHRE)T32DA041898 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Rachel Sayko Adams, Michael D Stein · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
Preventing HIV infection among people who inject drugs during COVID-19K01DA043412 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAZZI, ANGELA ROBERTSON · 2017 to 2021
$934k
NCATS NIH HHS 1UL1TR001430NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001430NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA043412NIDA NIH HHS K01DA043412NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA041898NIDA NIH HHS T32DA041898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeaths from opioid overdose have increased dramatically in the past decade. For individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD), agonist medications such as methadone and buprenorphine reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Historically, the provision of buprenorphine treatment in office-based settings has relied on frequent in-person contact, likely influencing patients' access to and retention in care. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, providers of office-based buprenorphine treatment rapidly adapted their care processes, increasingly relying on telemedicine visits. To date, relatively few prior studies have combined patient and clinician perspectives to examine the implementation of telemedicine and related care adaptations, particularly in safety-net settings.

methodsQualitative methods were used to explore clinician and patient experiences with telemedicine in an office-based buprenorphine treatment clinic affiliated with an urban safety-net hospital. From this clinic, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 patients and 16 clinicians (including prescribers and non-prescribers). We coded all interview data and used a thematic analysis approach to understand how telemedicine impacted treatment quality and engagement in care, as well as preferences for using telemedicine moving forward.

resultsFive themes regarding the implementation of telemedicine and other COVID-19-related care adaptations arose from patient and clinician perspectives: (1) telemedicine integration precipitated openness to more flexibility in care practices, (2) concerns regarding telemedicine-related adaptations centered around safety and accountability, (3) telemedicine encounters required rapport and trust between patients and clinicians to facilitate open communication, (4) safety-net patient populations experienced unique challenges when using telemedicine, particularly in terms of the technology required and the need for privacy, and (5) there is an important role for telemedicine in office-based buprenorphine treatment moving forward, primarily through its use in hybrid models of care which integrate both in-person and virtual visits.

conclusionsTelemedicine implementation within office-based buprenorphine treatment has the potential to improve patients' engagement in care; however, our findings emphasize the need for tailored approaches to implementing telemedicine in office-based buprenorphine treatment, particularly within safety-net settings. Overall, this study supports the maintenance of changes to policy and practice that facilitate the use of telemedicine in office-based buprenorphine treatment beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineCOVID-19Opiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersTelemedicineAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2BuprenorphineBuprenorphineCOVID-19Medications for opioid use disorderOpioid use disorderQualitative researchTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40033433
PMCPMC11877703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.